We Tried. Kind of.

10 sept 2018


Missy Beattie had a piece on CPunch this weekend about the frustration involved in writing just about anything having to do with the US these days, using the refrain “words get in the way”.  And while I’m just another old guy with a need to scribble, I think I get what she means.

The opportunity for changing things has come and gone.  Raised in a world divorced from reality, it took us way too long to realise that we’d been had, that too many of us were too comfortable to go beyond our feeble, non-threatening protests and demonstrations, or to join those who did put their lives on the line for a chance at change.

In other words, we blew it.  Thus our frustration and anguish at what could have been had we been more courageous.

We can still send a message, however late it might be.  We can create a huge BDS movement against the media and retail giants who are taking control of pretty much everything simply to let them know that we’re on to their game.  But I sincerely wonder how many screen-gazers are inclined to go into detox.  On the other hand, if Robert Hunziker isn’t crazy, we probably don’t have enough time remaining to do much of anything since our Planet is just about ready to get rid of us.

Thus our frustration and anguish at our own stupidity and cowardice.  And yet here I sit in this fifty person hamlet, tapping away at this ecocidal device, trying to make sense of it all.  It would probably be better to simply find a piece of paper and a pen or pencil and put a message in a bottle:  “We tried.  Kind of”.

Posted in Uncategorized

Is this even possible?

Of course it is.  A little gander at the zombies around you lets you know that anything is possible these days.

1 mai 2018


-David Walshwsws.org

Back in the mid sixties, when I was in high school and the Women’s Lib movement was sharing the spotlight with the war in Viet Nam in our late night weekend discussions, I commented that I saw men’s liberation as being just as, if not more, important, in that with men running the place, any kind of peaceful, equitable, just world didn’t seem to be in the offing.  That if Women’s Lib meant that women were going to be more like men, they were trying to climb the wrong ladder.

The article linked above brought that youthful evening back to mind.  And while that comment may have been naïve and less than nuanced, I still consider the male ethos that has brought us Neo-liberal globalisation, ecocide, and brutal, endless neo-colonial war, just so they can be rich, must be recognised for what it is, and not held up as an example to be emulated.  You’ve got to be a pretty sick puppy to write stuff like this:

She concludes, “I want to make the kind of money that allows me to jet to Mexico on a Tuesday, to meaningfully contribute to nasty politicians, to afford a shark of a lawyer if any man ever lays a finger on me again. If anyone calls that obnoxious, I want to do what men do, and shrug.”

Consider some women who have recently acceded to male (or near male) equivalency:  Madeleine Albright, Hilary Clinton, Condoleeza Rice, Samantha Power, Victoria Nuland, Nicky Haley.  Lovely bunch, that.  Which is why it is so frustrating trying to talk to so many so-called “liberal” friends who still defend, tooth and nail, a psychopath like Clinton and, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, continue to believe that Russia, or China, or the beleaguered Syrian people under the “tyranny” of an optometrist are somehow threats to the well-being of the 99%, of which, though they may not believe it today, are definitely a part.  Because they are still floating just above that no-man’s land, that “no-go zone” of poverty, protected as they are by legacy investments and a flippant ignorance of the world, distracted by a pre-adolescent culture of spectacle and narcissism, this issue-divided cohort, blind to its own superficiality and ultimate uselessness (except, perhaps, to the nefarious plans of our oligarchs), will probably be dumb-struck by the failure of their virtually constructed lives to protect them from their inevitable fall.

We can expect outrage and lots of temper tantrum foot stomping when their personal assistants (real or electronic) disappear.  The former because they’ve joined the revolution (or gone back to their former countries, joining the people who stayed and fought the US there), the latter because the Net has been “temporarily” suspended or taken down by the government or by hackers who can no longer put up with the supercilious CEOs of the various (anti-) social media.  They’ll find themselves wandering around in an unknown world of books, actual conversations, unable to photoshop themselves into their own meta-reality, having nervous breakdowns because someone might really see them for who they are.  They might even have to talk to their neighbours.

Walsh comments:

As we noted at the time, that the Times should carry such an open appeal for women to be single-mindedly greedy and power-hungry and identified that program with contemporary feminism and the #MeToo movement was revealing. It was refreshing in the face of the innumerable attempts by the pseudo-left organizations and various commentators to portray the sexual misconduct campaign as something progressive.

Knoll takes this one step farther, by arguing that the appropriate response to sexual assault is to become rich, powerful and selfish.

The novelist passes on this repugnant view to her readers, but she did not grab it out of the blue. This is the product of decades of intellectual debasement in America, the creation of an anti-culture that bows down before money and fame. In fact, money is viewed as the antidote to every problem, the “truly creative power,” as Karl Marx termed it in 1844, “the general confounding and confusing of all things—the world upside-down—the confounding and confusing of all natural and human qualities.”

The entire article is worth reading.  Especially today, May 1st.

Granted, today’s the fifth, but who’s to say that the revolution has to have a precise date?  It’s not like we’re going to go shopping for it.

Posted in Uncategorized

I think we’ve heard this before.

To use Jim Kunstler’s phrase, what a “clusterfuck”!  Political drones like Theresa May, like any drone, are paid not to think.  Just like the journo hacks supposedly “reporting” stuff like this.   People like May are paid to spout any nonsense they’re handed to read.  As to who, exactly, is writing this nonsense about the Russians involved in extra-territorial murders doesn’t really make any difference.  These so-called “people”, these arbiters of public opinion, are exposed every day, in all our daily “news”papers.  They condemn themselves with every word they write.  Why anyone pays any attention to this nonsense is beyond me.

If you want to try to sort it all out, I would suggest you follow the links provided below.







I don’t know what I can add to all this but to say that it’s beyond belief that anyone can swallow this stuff.


https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/03/of-a-type-developed-by-liars/ found on https://russia-insider.com/en/bombshell-british-scientists-balked-pressure-link-nerve-gas-russia/ri22809

https://russia-insider.com/en/shocking-diplomatic-incompetence-theresa-may-and-boris-johnson/ri22802  A recent post from Orlov.  Read it.

Conclude what you will.


https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/skripal-russian-web-or-rusi-web – Very informative article by former British intelligence officer.  Link provided by commenter BigB to this article on OffGuardan:  https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/16/uks-novichok-claim-exposed-as-lies-what-is-the-current-reality-of-the-skripal-case/ .

Posted in Uncategorized

Russia’s Warning

11 mars 2018


Posted nearly two years ago, I would urge anyone who stops by this blog to read this short, succinct, and prescient letter to the citizens of the US, especially in light of US reactions to Mr Putin’s recent speech to the Russian Federal Assembly. Still not convinced? Orlov’s got a more recent post that deals with reality based consequences of Russia’s new defence stance.

I would also suggest visiting The Saker’s blog which has a number of posts concerning the speech that provide commentary and context sorely needed in these days of headline-grabbing hyperbole.

On another note, Orlov’s use of the Chekhov quote about the “gun on the wall” reminded me of The Polemicist’s article on gun rights from a Left point of view, which I highly recommend.



Posted in Uncategorized

Presstitues on Fire. I Love it.




I don’t do Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, PayPal. They’re all part of my personal BDS movement. And while I often wonder why people who rant against the corporate oligarchy use platforms that enrich these same oligarchs, I figure it’s their karma, and who am I to judge, anyway? The pace of things these days is already too fast for my liking. Besides, I don’t have one of those super phones. I reckon if something important happens, I’ll hear about it sooner or later, like I did when I went over to MediaLens this morning, after seeing the headline at DissidentVoice.

Reading that the corporate twits (is that why they “tweet”?) were all atwitter in indignation at the thought that writing for our oligarchs, in order to be paid and eventually accede to Westminster, may not be the best way for an aspiring journalist (or any other writer, for that matter), who has any sense of ethics or real courage, to begin a career. In other words, writing for free, writing what you want, not what your corporate masters tell you. “Following your bliss”.

Since corporate media are nothing more than government propaganda agencies, writing for them means that you’re just fine with the wars, the inequality, the environmental destruction, and pretty much everything else that’s wrong with the world these days. Which, to me, means that you’re also pretty well qualified to man the joysticks of the drones patrolling not only the skies of however many relatively defenceless countries The West is occupying, bombing, subverting, but the very surveillance state your  oligarchs run. Meaning your own. Or doing anything else they tell you to do. Kind of like being a slave. Kind of like Ward Churchill’s “Good Little Eichmanns”.

In any case, I found it pretty funny that all those so-called journalists would react with such frenzy to something that is becoming more evident. They’re being seen for what they are: sycophants. Frightened little scribblers whose cover is being blown. Read the article. It’s worth it.

It makes me think of how the Russians could very well be looking at, and thinking about, the US and its European and other various vassal states: People so uninformed, so close-minded that it would be hilarious if they weren’t totally deluded and armed to the teeth.

Which brings me to the second link above. While not directly related, O’Brien is pointing out how the corporatocracy sees as part of its mission the dumbing down of its consumers. And not just the WallMart shoppers (who probably don’t care what the CFR has to say about anything), whose sale behaviour resembles the piling on of MediaLens’ critics. No, supposedly well respected think tanks and magazines (dare I say it?) constantly pump out pure propaganda, no matter how well it may be written, in order to enforce this herd mentality. That’s their job. Con a different class of consumer, but con it just the same.

There did exist cooperative societies at one time. Their histories have been lost in the fog
of too many wars. Ending his piece, O’Brien writes:

To keep the West going as a project requires – it seems – that the West be dumb. If that’s the case then the West and Wall Street – with or without the white supremacy – has no future. And who knows – the supremacy of the Reds might return. Not just in Russia and China but everywhere.


I don’t think any of this is news to a certain segment of the public who attempt to remain informed. Our job is to grow that segment, and at the same time, reduce that percentage of the population overly influenced by corporate “twits”. By writing what we feel like writing. And doing it for free.

Posted in Uncategorized

Want to Recapture Your Mind? Read This.


Hirthler does it again.  Must read.  I normally don’t like articles that refer to films, but this makes total sense.  And yes, I watched the film.  Twice.

Since I now live in the EU, I found this paragraph of particular interest, having witnessed the erosion of nation-state sovereignty first hand.

This ‘Washington Consensus’ is the false promise promoted by the West. The reality is quite different. The crux of neoliberalism is to eliminate democratic government by downsizing, privatizing, and deregulating it. Proponents of neoliberalism recognize that the state is the last bulwark of protection for the common people against the predations of capital. Remove the state and they’ll be left defenseless. Think about it. Deregulation eliminates the laws. Downsizing eliminates departments and their funding. Privatizing eliminates the very purpose of the state by having the private sector take over its traditional responsibilities. Ultimately, nation-states would dissolve except perhaps for armies and tax systems. A large, open-border global free market would be left, not subject to popular control but managed by a globally dispersed, transnational one percent. And the whole process of making this happen would be camouflaged beneath the altruistic stylings of a benign humanitarianism.

I had the good luck to stumble across Circus Politicus (https://fr.scribd.com/document/363490104/Deloire-Christophe-Dubois-Christophe-Circus-Politicus-2012-Pastichat-Giga-978-2-226-26936-2) shortly after its publication, which I now consider the definitive work on the origins of, and the reasons behind, the EU.  Hirthler’s analysis of our present situation is entirely consistent with the conclusions reached in this revelatory and highly readable book.


Posted in Uncategorized

Slow Com Updated

24 jan 2018

I’m reading via WSWS and Jonathan Cook that the billionnaire bosses of US (anti-)social media sites are hiring these days, but don’t get your hopes up. Most of those jobs (if ,indeed, they are even located in the US) will probably be no more highly paid than the remaining supermarket cashiers in order to perform, if I stretch things a bit, jobs not that much different.

You want to pass through the check-out counter? You better have some cash or, more likely, in too many cases, enough credit remaining on your plastic, to make it to the exits. Or maybe I should have likened these new jobs to the armies of gropers we find infesting the airports these days. I doubt their pay is much different.

So what are these new jobs all about? They’re about checking to see if what you post on “their” media is okay with the US government. They’re about being “good little Eichmanns” for the “good big Eichmanns” who have decided to basically operate as sub-contractors, enforcers if you will, for the surveillance state.  Eric Prince comes to mind.

Personally, I don’t use any of that stuff. Yeah, I use a computer. At the moment, it’s a hundred sixty euro Lenovo ideapad, bought new last year when my last Mac went dark for some still unknown reason. I use it for the net, email, and writing stuff, some of which I put up on this blog. And yeah, I have a portable telephone which I use for telephone calls and receiving messages from the train company here so I can buy my tickets online so I don’t have to have a printed ticket. The train guys may, or may not, scan my “senior” card. But I’m good to go and have nothing to throw away when I arrive at my destination.

But I digress. For the few of you who stop by here, I figure you don’t need this warning anyway. You’re probably not addicted to (anti-) social media. In fact, I’ve got a correspondent in Spain who doesn’t even like the telephone. My kind of guy. Slow com, like slow food, is always worth the wait. If I want to visit him and his wife, I’ll probably just ask around his town and knock on his door.


And still I digress. Anecdotes keep getting in the way.

What amazes me is the fact that all, or most of, the sites that publish rants against our media oligarchs and their pernicious platforms continue to use the very platforms against which they rant. They know that there’s a good chance that (if it hasn’t already happened) their sites will, in one way or another, be discriminated against if not outright disappeared, kind of like all those nasty socialists (and other anti-capitalists) in various countries the world over who were, in some cases, pushed out of airplanes or helicopters over the nearest ocean at the behest of the various US agencies with whom our billionnaires now collaborate, and from whom they collect hundreds of millions of dollars in “finder’s fees”. Why these sites continue to use the near equivalent of Saudi head-choppers is beyond me. Have they never heard of the BDS movement? Have people forgotten how to write a check? Or is that no longer allowed? Or are our keyboard warriors too lazy to get off their asses to go down their local (hopefully, if any still exist) bank and cash them?

If people are so pissed off at the billionnaire media masters, why continue to do business with them?

For example, the quality of the baguettes at one of our neighborhood bakeries went south a while ago, and we changed bakeries. I stopped by the other day for a different kind of bread, and the woman behind the counter remarked that she hadn’t seen me for a while. Had I been out of town? No, I replied, it was just that the former quality of their baguette had gone missing, and we had been buying elsewhere. Had they changed baker, flour supplier? Yes, she answered, and I wasn’t the only one who remarked the difference. She offered me a half baguette and hoped that we would find it up to their previous standards. As it turned out, it wasn’t all that bad. A bit short of their former quality, but not bad at all.

Granted, you can’t walk into the offices of our billionnaire head choppers and demand that they leave you alone, any more than you ask the same of any of our politicians or any of our so-called security agencies. They’re all safely walled off in any number of physical or virtual nether worlds whose boundaries seem to know no limits. The only way to reduce their power is to stop feeding them. Is that too much to ask?

Posted in Uncategorized